Monday, 25 April 2016

Practical Evaluation — Study Task 08 — OUGD501

What were your initial aims?
To execute a real-world branding scenario and compare the different techniques that trends have to offer. Then perform a side by side comparison to determine what trends create a well-informed branding outcome that aided the concept of the product (if any).

The product that was selected was at random. Ensuring that no specific idea’s existed before making the comparison. This test was undertaken to prove that trends do in fact have a conceptual aspect that can relate to that specific product, albeit a loose link.


What processes / strategies have you used and why?
Using the same scene throughout the mock up stages enables a fair comparison of the trends. This also makes the test unbiased to avoid any trends being more affective than others.


What literature have you read that informs this work?
By analysing the work of as many different sources as I could has allowed insight into the world of trends, why they come about, and what makes them so popular amongst a certain crowd. The works of Walter Benjamin has helped me get to grips with the fundamentals of mechanical reproduction, something of which I was never aware of previous to this module. Also the works of Pascal Geilen on the murmuring of the artistic multitude which has helped me understand how the digital age has affected design and increased the typical consumer attitude towards design.


Is the work effective (in terms of your aims)? In what ways? How do you know it is effective (testing)?
Yes. This test has results and the outcomes have all been analysed to determine which outcomes were successful. Having a handful that were informed by the product has proven that trends do in fact serve a purpose in the validity of design when presented correctly.


Does it communicate what it should do (in what ways)?
The publication produced was mostly down to the subject’s opinion. However, by adding a small blurb at the start of the book explains its aims and leaves the reader to use their own judgement as to whether it is successful or not.


What are the successful elements and why?
Having answered the original question and gained a good variation of techniques that can be utilised in my future practice has rendered this test successful.


What areas need improving or developing further and why?

In my next COP module, the practical will be informed more by what the readers opinion is on the subject. Gaining more comprehensive results will further validate my points that are being asked in the initial thesis.

No comments :

Post a Comment